Also attending were James Fiscus (Clayton and Endeavour), Sam Justice (OSFCI Attorney), Michael Monical (GameStorm 14 Chair), Devlin Perez (OryCon 33 Chair); Paul Brinker, and Ruth Sachter.
The meeting started at 7:32PM, Aaron Cell Phone Time.
The GameStorm 13 books are ready to be closed (more on that in the GameStorm 13 report). The Westercon bid books are in the process of being closed. (The bid’s bank account has been closed–it’s just a matter of getting a few questions answered.)
The taxes have been filed (earlier than last year, we hope to do even better next year).
Wells Fargo is instituting a $3 monthly charge for using a debit card. Rick has tried to get that waived based on the total of all the accounts we have with Wells Fargo, but he hasn’t had any success with that yet. Paul Brinker: Maybe we should find a new bank. Rick: That’s a possibility.
The new carts for the art show panels and steel were purchased, and worked quite well for Renovation.
We still need to purchase the Worldcon memberships (for the John Andrews Grants), especially since Chicon goes up at the end of the month.
We are now paying for storage units again. The two new units on the ground floor (for the art show panels and steel, as well as other heavy objects) will be costing us a total about $2560 a year (the original unit is still comped because we’re a non-profit group.) There was some discussion about the units and the new charge. Should we be looking for a new location? The consensus was that we’re not likely to be find a better price, this location is very central (and we have 24hr access), and they’ve done good by us by giving us the free unit for several years.
The treasurer’s report was then accepted unanimously.
GameStorm drew 984 people, and written reports were distributed. $5000 is being given to Doernbecher Children’s Hospital, and $1,695.43 to the Endeavour Fund. (OSFCI’s portion of the surplus is $6,695.44). All of these numbers are after the OSFCI overhead fee and any seed money has been paid back to OSFCI, and also include the money rolled forward from GameStorms 11 and 12–no money is being rolled to GameStorm 14.
The Board accepted the closing of GameStorm 13, as long as Rick (OSFCI Treasurer) accepts the final accounting.
The current registration numbers are only approximate, as it’s been difficult to get updates from Registration. Based on Stephe’s research of the payments we’ve received, currently there are roughly 396 adults and 22 children, as well as 95 or 96 comped panelists, and 33 dealers. It is approximately the same level we were at last year. (Over the last few years, OryCon registration has been shifting towards more people buying the memberships at the door.) (Years ago, it was split 50/50 between pre-reg and at-the-door registrations.)
There was some discussion about the state of OryCon registration. The software used last year for badge printing isn’t available this year because of conflicts between two groups of people (neither of which were OryCon). John mentioned that he’d heard from people both the previous weekend (at Bentocon) and last month at Renovation who had sent in checks for memberships many months ago and have heard nothing, even after sending numerous queries by e-mail. They have no idea if they have memberships for this year. Stephe: All checks that have come to him have been cashed; some of them may have gone elsewhere–he doesn’t know about those. And there is not a list available of who Wes (Contreras) has listed as having OryCon memberships.
John: Are there once again going to be no progress reports for OryCon this year? (That is correct.) In the past, that was one way for people to know that they were properly registered for OryCon.
Aaron: What is the status of OryCon programming? Andrew: The programming frenzy will be next weekend at the hotel. They are a little bit behind compared to normal, which means that more people will be getting phone calls this coming weekend during the programming work session.
There was more discussion about registration. Devlin said that some of the problems stem from what (and wasn’t) handed over by the previous year’s reg person (i.e. the information on the memberships that we sold at last year’s OryCon for this year’s). Aaron: Where can the Board help you get the problems fixed? Devlin: We need to get the records from last year so that we know who paid for this year. Stephe said that he had a spreadsheet with the information on the 192 people who paid last year for this year. John: It seems like a high-priority item would be to get together as soon as possible a list of everyone who OryCon thinks has joined and get that on the web page (along with a working e-mail address for registration), so that people can check to see if they actually have a membership.
Tracy will assemble the list from the available sources, so that people can check on their memberships. This list will be put on the web site ASAP (once Rick can install the CMS software on the web site that the new OryCon webmaster wants to run). Tracy will try to have this done by the end of next weekend.
Jim: Is it the normal policy that, when people send in their money, they receive an immediate confirmation? John: No, other than the online receipt from PayPal when they purchase their membership via PayPal, OryCon has never sent out confirmations on an immediate basis. (In times past, they have been sent progress reports, but those are no longer being published.)
Ruth: How are hotel bookings going? Tammy: The current block is 59% full. The minimum needed to avoid extra payments is 65% (it’s lower this year because of the situation with the other group needing rooms on Friday night), so we’re already close to that threshold. We’re not aiming people at the Red Lion (the overflow hotel) until we pass the 65% level.
Debbie: One of the problems with the web site is that there’s no committee list and no contact information, so it’s very difficult to know who to contact if there’s a question. Devlin: The committee list will be posted to the web site once the new webmaster is in place.
Paul suggested that we approach Dean Wesley Smith about running his profile of Bill Trojan in the program book, since Bill was a long-time OryCon attendee and book dealer.
The OryCon 33 report was accepted.
The Board has not yet appointed a liaison to GameStorm 14. Aaron was appointed to this role. Memberships are coming in at a good pace–there were more in July than there was in June, more in August than there was in July. GameStorm is ahead of last year in paid members (there were 41 "Guest GMs" last year were paid by the previous year–those aren’t being comped this year, so the total number is a little lower).
(There was some discussion on the possible new scheduling software–more on that below.)
The report was accepted unanimously.
Aaron still needs to talk to the winning Westercon people about donating the remainder of our pre-support money (and maybe receiving any pre-support discounts for the people who supported the Portland bid).
This is the last OryCon at which Paul and Debbie will be doing and fundraising. Aaron: have there been any nibbles on that yet? Andrew had suggested three people, two in town and one in Seattle. They’d heard nothing back from the two local people, and decided the person in Seattle wasn’t a good fit.
There’s no finance report, since the third quarter of 2011 hasn’t ended yet. Their report was accepted by the Board.
Beverly has drafted a letter and application for future recipients. The final versions will be sent out to the OryCon and GameStorm lists, with the applications due on January 1st, 2012 and the recipient will be announced at the Annual General Meeting. She would also like to see an article about John Andrews on the OSFCI web site. Ruth suggested that we put notices about the Worldcon grant on other OSFCI web pages, and also put a notice in the OryCon program book.
Aaron: Who all is on the committee? Beverly, Ruth and Marc.
The report was accepted.
The committee is still working on a recommendation regarding changing the number of corporation members needed to make changes to the bylaws. It’s hoped that there will be a suggested change to propose by the time of the December board meeting.
The report was accepted.
Tammy is in negotiation with the Portland Doubletree for the 2014 contract for OryCon. The latest changes and recommendations have been sent to Monica Pea and we’re waiting for her response. They did offer several bonuses if we signed by the end of September (extra meeting planner points, etc.), but we’re not going to do so unless we can get some of the issues settled first.
Tammy has also received confirmation that we can use our own Clearwire wireless equipment, which will save us paying the hotel for Internet feeds.
The report was accepted.
The Board voted 9-0 to accept Tracy’s bid to be the chair of OryCon 34, and 10-0 to appoint Arthur as the liaison from the OSFCI Board to the convention.
There was some discussion about purchasing a new refrigerator, which was not in Devlin’s request he sent yesterday (and which the Board decided they needed a specific request for at the previous board meeting). After some discussion, $350 was added to purchase a full-sized refrigerator (ideally, a reconditioned one). The Board voted unanimously to approve up to $850 for the equipment.
Arthur: This would only be for gaming and not registration? Beverly: Tying it to registration later is a possibility, but this would be primarily designed for gaming.
Normally, events start to be submitted around OryCon and get finalized in January. People start signing up for them in February, roughly a month before GameStorm. The big hit to the system is when people start signing up, because everybody does so instantly as soon as they the system is opened up.
Aaron: So essentially, OSFCI would be prepaying for what amounts to custom software. Beverly: Yes. Aaron: How much? Beverly: We’re not sure yet. Rachel would need to upgrade her own system to use it for development, and that’s going to be about $800 for the components.
Sam: Are you talking about a contract with GameStorm or with OSFCI? Beverly: With OSFCI. Sam: And who would be the contracting parties? Beverly: With my partner (Rachel) and myself, either as individuals or as a corporation. Sam: Will there be a written contract? Beverly: Yes. (There was some more discussion with Sam on the legal aspects of contracting with Beverly and Rachel, and any liability from that agreement.) Arthur: With Beverly being a member of the board, will there be any problems with OSFCI making payments to a board member? And are there tax implications? Sam: As long as the conflict of interest is disclosed, it’s OK. It would be a payment to a contracting party–there should not be any problem with that, as long as the board member involved abstains from the vote and discloses her interest in the entity that is contracting with OSFCI. It would be a problem if OSFCI participated in the development and held partial ownership with the contracting company or in the developed software, and they themselves marketed the software. It’s better for OSFCI to contract with companies to produce the software, and in exchange for a license to use the software specifically for OSFCI events.
Paul Brinker: Would there be an annual support fee? Beverly: Certainly not for GameStorm. Sam: And this should be addressed in the contract. In approving any possible contract, it’s important that any conflicts be disclosed, and any approval of the final product be made by board members (or people appointed by the board) that does not include the people who would be paid for the product.
After some discussion, it was decided that the Board would entertain a proposal from Beverly to provide this software, and it would be more efficient to have any proposal reviewed by Marc, Rick and John on a technical basis, and then Sam on a legal basic before the full board considers it.
The date of the next meeting will be Monday, December 12th, at the Lloyd Center Doubletree hotel at 7:30PM.
Contributions from O32's surplus already exceeded the (conservatively) budgeted amount for this entire year, and OSFCI's share of GS13's surplus has yet to be calculated and delivered. At this midyear point, it appears OSFCI will again be flush in funds this year.
Wireless access capital purchases were incurred by the GS13 staff, and per previous agreement with the board, the convention was reimbursed $850 as we've determined capital equipment should be an OSFCI expense and not a convention expense.
As most have heard, the Westercon bid did not win; consequently, there will be a relatively quick closing of the books and the accounts opened for them will be closed. One lesson learned -- on a bid (for any con) we probably don't need the fancy checks and check stamp until after we win -- that accounted for a significant part of the Westercon expenses, in the end, and proved unnecessary. These books too may close as soon as the day of the Board meeting, but probably end of July at the latest.
An extension was filed for taxes but for once it was not due to con treasurers being late with information. Kudos to the con treasurers in exceeding my expectations. It was due to the OSFCI Treasurer having Renovation, OSFCI, work, and vacation all collide in roughly the same time/space. It is expected a single extension will be all that is required (July looks like a relatively quiet month for three of those).
Note the addition to the budget of a line for expenses associated with the Andrews Award. This was inadvertently omitted from the budget in the copy from the last meeting. This year $1050 is allocated, representing a $500 stipend, $180 to purchase a membership in the 2011 Worldcon (Reno), $175 to purchase a membership in the 2012 Worldcon (Chicago), and $195 to purchase a membership in the 2013 Worldcon (site not yet determined). In future years, the budgeted amount will be closer to $700, which is enough for the stipend and just one membership, purchased two years in advance, shortly after the winning bid is announced in late summer.
At the time of this report, I had not received a report from the Petrey Fund or the Clayton fund and thus cannot report on their balances. All other OSFCI accounts are at a single bank to which I have access and are included below.
Current (as of 5/25/11) account status:
|Acct||Balance||Change from 4/25/11 report|
|Balance January 1, 2011||$7,674.22|
|Total Deposits in 2011:||$6,275.47|
|Total Checks for Grants:||$5,000.00|
|Balance July 1, 2011:||$8949.69|
We have enough money in the account to make the additional grant we anticipate to the writer we are helping. We are, however, considering a fund raising drive to rebuild the Fund's ability to meet emergencies.
|Committee Members||First Appointed||Term Expires|
|James Fiscus, Chairman||October 1996||November 2012|
|Page Fuller, Treasurer||October 1996||November 2012|
|Arthur Aldridge, OSFCI Rep.||July 2005||While serving on OSFCI Board.|
|Geri Jeter||November 2002||November 2013|
|Ruth Sachter||November 2002||November 2013|
|Marc Wells||November 2003||November 2013|
We've started collecting books published in 2011 from publishers for next year's Award
We have $5,026.14 in the bank.
|Committee Members||First Appointed||Term Expires|
|Sarah Bryant||October 2006||November 2012|
|James Fiscus, Chairman||October 1996||November 2014|
|Page Fuller||October 1996||November 2014|
|Marilyn J. Holt||September 2000||November 2014|
|Sara Mueller||October 2003||November 2013|
|Alan Rosenthal||January 2006||November 2012|
|Sheila Simonson||October 1996||November 2013|
|Shawn Wall, Treasurer||November 2005||November 2013|
Attached is the Financial Report for the 2nd quarter. In addition, we anticipate receiving checks from both OryCon 32 and Microsoft.
We hope to attend the final Clarion West party in Seattle and meet both Charles Stross and Alisa Alering. We continue to plan the 2011 Brew Pub Fundraising Tour and the Egg Sales at OryCon 33. While continuing to administer the Fund, we wish to reiterate that 2011 will be the last year that we, personally, will be directly raising funds at OryCon.
Paul M. Wrigley
Susan C. Petrey Scholarship
Income Statement - Q2 2011
|OCF Balance (6/30/2011)||$47,659.85|
Changes to Section VIII, which reads:
"VIII. Board Meetings
Such meetings shall generally be held on the Monday of the week but may be scheduled on another week day within the designated week (including both weekends). The meeting dates shall be set by the Board of Directors at the previous Board Meeting, or within two weeks after the Annual Meeting (whichever is later). Efforts shall be made to schedule Board meetings at least one week later than the end of an OSFCI-sponsored event.
Meetings may be postponed by no more than one week if the majority of the Board feels that the change is necessary to effectively conduct the business of the Corporation, as long as the decision is made far enough in advance of the new meeting date for the Secretary to send the required notification.
Except in the case of emergency, regularly scheduled Board meetings shall start no earlier than 7:30pm Monday through Friday, 1:00PM Saturday and Sunday.
The main thrust of the suggested change is that the Board return to the practice of meeting bimonthly, rather than quarterly. Meeting more often will give the Board more meeting hours during the course of the year to fully consider items brought before it (rather than postponing them to subsequent meetings for lack of time), and will give it a quicker response time to new issues.
It will also place a full Board meeting (rather than just election of officers) closer to the time of GameStorm. The present schedule has the last full meeting of the Board in December, 3.5 months before that convention. GameStorm is becoming a larger and more complex convention as the years pass, and is deserving of more attention from the Board.
The proposed schedule of meetings would be:
Changes to Section XII, which reads:
The Bylaws of this Corporation may be adopted, amended, or rescinded in whole or in part by at affirmative vote of a majority of the Membership."
The first recommendation is to change the phrase "a majority" to "40%", or other appropriate percentage. The Secretary has been asked to provide records of the past five years of Annual General Meetings, to determine what percentage of membership voted at those meetings, either in person or by proxy. The change would be such as to have made the average percentage voting at those meetings a sufficient percentage for a change to the Bylaws to have been allowed.
The second recommendation is to specify in this section a process by which a vote on changing the Bylaws can be held, other than at the Annual General Meeting. Said process should include provisions regarding:
Stephen Raymond, Chair